Animals seized from Utterson farm
2007-09-26
Jacqueline Lawrence, Bracebridge Examiner
The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has seized
a number of animals from an Utterson farm known
for giving public tours which include lions,
tigers and other exotic wildlife.
MNR staff has confirmed that a search warrant was
executed Sept. 20 on Guha’s Tigers and Lions farm
on Muskoka Road 4, just north of Bracebridge.
Paul Van Schyndel, MNR enforcement officer, said a
number of native animals were removed from the
farm. The animals, including two lynx, two foxes,
two wild turkeys and two wolves, were taken to an
undisclosed location.
While Van Schyndel would not comment on why the
search and seizure took place, he did say Guha’s
did not have ministry authorization to possess the
animals.
Anyone in possession of wildlife native to Ontario
must have authorization from the province. Such
authorization must be renewed on an annual basis,
and is conditional upon ministry inspections
ensuring the animals’ welfare.
The investigation into Guha’s animal farm is
ongoing, Van Schyndel said. Nanda Guha, the owner
of the farm, is slated to appear in Huntsville
court Oct. 5.
Port Carling residents Stacy Young and Dan
Bornstein recently visited the farm and came away
with concerns about how the remaining animals are
being cared for. Guha still has dozens of other
animals, such as lions, tigers and jaguars, which
the ministry has no authority to remove.
“We’re supposed to be the home of sophisticated
cottagers,” said Borstein, “and we’re sheltering
torture.”
Nanda Guha disputes Young’s and Borstein’s claims
that his animals are not properly cared for. The
public, he said, often judges animal caretakers
without understanding the difficulties they face.
“How much do they know about these animals?” Guha
asked. “Everyone can make an opinion, but does
that make it right?”
Guha went on to allege racial discrimination on
the part of the MNR. “They’re taking (animals)
away from me because I’m black,” he said.
Van Schyndel vehemently denied the allegation.
“That’s absolutely, totally false,” Van Schyndel
said. Guha, he said, did not obtain MNR
authorization to keep the wildlife, and refused to
allow ministry staff to inspect his farm.
The MNR’s only option was to remove the animals,
he said.
The court case is prompting a renewed push by some
for tighter controls on the possession of exotic
animals in Muskoka Lakes township.
Muskoka Wildlife Centre co-director Jody Gienow
points out that lions and tigers do not fall under
the ministry’s jurisdiction, as no provincial
legislation exists governing the possession of
exotic wildlife.
“It’s totally illogical,” Gienow said. “Who is
there to look out for these other critters?”
Unlike Bracebridge, Gravenhurst and Huntsville,
Muskoka Lakes has no bylaw regulating exotic
animals. Without such a bylaw, anyone in the
township may own or operate a “backyard zoo,” with
large and potentially dangerous animals, Gienow
said.
Even the Ontario Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) can do little to
regulate such operations. The organization can
only investigate complaints of cruelty, she said.
This kind of regulatory gap means Muskoka Lakes
residents have carte blanche to own any animal
they please, and house it in whatever fashion they
desire. Because no bylaw is in place, no
regulations exist outlining what size of cages or
fencing should be used for exotic animals like
lions, Gienow noted.
Stacy Young said she approached Muskoka Lakes
mayor Susan Pryke to discuss the issue, but was
put off by her response.
“She said she was more concerned with passing a
tree-cutting bylaw,” Young remarked.
When contacted, Pryke said Young’s and Borstein’s
criticism “is warranted.” Pryke said the township
has made a tree-cutting bylaw a priority, but
acknowledged that an exotic animal bylaw is
needed.
“We can’t get it all done in one year, but we will
do better,” said Pryke.
The mayor said she intends to add an exotic animal
bylaw to the municipality’s agenda for 2008.
|